Talk:A Fix with Sontarans (TV story)

Canon?

Now, at first glance, this story appears to be non-canon. Most agree this story is such. However, as ST: Fixing a Hole is created to be a seaqel to this story, then shouldn't it be cannon?

We've used this LoJack on other pages, like Dimensions in Time. Now, it was created to be canon, but is very confusing, like many Doctor Who episodes. The only reason given for it to be Non-canical is that NA: First Frontier says so. So, even though we (and I) may not like it, this story may be canon... But what do you guys think? OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 00:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Without a doubt, I think that both AFwS and its ST sequel are both non-canonical. There's too much that has changed since it first aired to be able to slip in into canonicity, even if they were originally supposed to be canonical (which I kinda doubt). Tardis1963 talk 00:42, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Well, I doubt it was supposed to be canon too, but like I said, Dimensions in Time WAS supposed to be canon, but isn't now, so...

Plus, I don't think you can really argue that the ST sequel is non canon, I mean, the BE crossover with the Dalek films is still canon, right? I think this discussion is a bit too big and important for a Talk page... I'm going to request it be opend to a forum, similar to Forum:Is The Curse of Fatal Death canon? OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 01:47, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind, but I have moved your above comment to Forum:Is A Fix With Sontarans Canon?, with citation, of coarse. OS25 (talk to me, baby.) 02:28, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Title

Because the episode does not, in fact, have a title as broadcast, the origin of the name, which I don't in itself dispute, must be spelled out in the article before the {{conjecture}} note can be removed.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 19:06: Wed 11 Jan 2012 

Never mind. I'm an idiot. Or all that colour in the Colin Baker titles burned out my eyes. It is indeed titled on broadcast.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍ 21:19: Wed 11 Jan 2012