Forum:Request for television series template: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
Stardizzy2 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*Regular cast | *Regular cast | ||
:All the articles listed provide information and are written in an encyclopaedic format. I'm not sure a template would sit within the article very well. (Additionally not sure what the website is meant to explain, aside from there being a doco called 'The Planet of the Doctor'). From the list of requests it seems a table would be more useful than a template. --[[User:Tangerineduel|Tangerineduel]] 14:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
::the URL (which I deleted) has no significance. I only cut and pasted wrong. the ''Star Trek'' Wiki has this. maybe useful for "at a glance" information so that the main article doesn't have to repeat the info. it also looks slicker and cleaner. --[[User:Stardizzy2|Stardizzy2]] 15:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
: |
Revision as of 15:42, 27 August 2008
Series which could use a template
- Doctor Who
- Torchwood
- The Sarah Jane Adventures
- K-9 & Company
- Totally Doctor Who
- Doctor Who Confidential
- Torchwood Declassified
- The Planet of the Doctor
- See here http://www.cbc.ca/planetofthedoctor/ --Stardizzy2 00:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed format
- Title
- Length of episodes
- Number of episodes
- First episode airdate
- Last (or last to date) episode airdate
- List of episodes
- Regular cast
- All the articles listed provide information and are written in an encyclopaedic format. I'm not sure a template would sit within the article very well. (Additionally not sure what the website is meant to explain, aside from there being a doco called 'The Planet of the Doctor'). From the list of requests it seems a table would be more useful than a template. --Tangerineduel 14:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- the URL (which I deleted) has no significance. I only cut and pasted wrong. the Star Trek Wiki has this. maybe useful for "at a glance" information so that the main article doesn't have to repeat the info. it also looks slicker and cleaner. --Stardizzy2 15:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)