Forum:Origin of administrator nomination process: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
(+comment) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I've created a new page, [[Tardis:User rights]] (text is from another wiki I use), to help make it easier and clearer for people to request or be nominated to become an administrator and give other users the opportunity to support or disagree with the nominations, allowing a week for the nominations to be commented on. Any comments/ideas?--[[User:GingerM|GingerM]] 18:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | I've created a new page, [[Tardis:User rights]] (text is from another wiki I use), to help make it easier and clearer for people to request or be nominated to become an administrator and give other users the opportunity to support or disagree with the nominations, allowing a week for the nominations to be commented on. Any comments/ideas?--[[User:GingerM|GingerM]] 18:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Do you really think that we need any more bureaucrats? We have 9 already, so it's not likely we're going to need any more in the near future. {{:User:Ghelæ/sig}} 16:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:41, 6 February 2007
Index → Panopticon → Origin of administrator nomination process
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I've created a new page, Tardis:User rights (text is from another wiki I use), to help make it easier and clearer for people to request or be nominated to become an administrator and give other users the opportunity to support or disagree with the nominations, allowing a week for the nominations to be commented on. Any comments/ideas?--GingerM 18:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
