Concept: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Created page with "{{Wikipediainfo}} Arnheim claimed that a '''concept''' could be philosophically valid even if theologically meaningless. (TV: ''[[Dragonfir...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Wikipediainfo}} | {{Wikipediainfo}} | ||
[[Arnheim]] claimed that a '''concept''' could be [[Philosophy|philosophically]] valid even if [[Theology|theologically]] meaningless. ([[TV]]: ''[[Dragonfire (TV story)|Dragonfire]]'') | [[Arnheim]] claimed that a '''concept''' could be [[Philosophy|philosophically]] valid even if [[Theology|theologically]] meaningless. ([[TV]]: ''[[Dragonfire (TV story)|Dragonfire]]'') | ||
Generally, the [[Dalek]]s had no concept of [[blasphemy]], excepting the [[Dalek of human origin]] created by the [[Dalek Emperor (The Parting of the Ways)|Dalek Emperor]], ([[TV]]: ''[[The Parting of the Ways (TV story)|The Parting of the Ways]]'') [[elegance]] ([[TV]]: ''[[Doomsday (TV story)|Doomsday]]'') or [[worry]]. ([[TV]]: ''[[Daleks in Manhattan (TV story)|Daleks in Manhattan]]'') However, according to [[Davros]], the Daleks did have a "strong" concept of [[home]], leading them to rebuild [[Skaro]]. ([[TV]]: ''[[The Witch's Familiar (TV story)|The Witch's Familiar]]'') | |||
[[Category:Concepts|*]] | [[Category:Concepts|*]] | ||
Revision as of 09:22, 20 November 2019
Arnheim claimed that a concept could be philosophically valid even if theologically meaningless. (TV: Dragonfire)
Generally, the Daleks had no concept of blasphemy, excepting the Dalek of human origin created by the Dalek Emperor, (TV: The Parting of the Ways) elegance (TV: Doomsday) or worry. (TV: Daleks in Manhattan) However, according to Davros, the Daleks did have a "strong" concept of home, leading them to rebuild Skaro. (TV: The Witch's Familiar)
