Talk:Romana: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→Romana) |
(→Magazines: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
do we have any indication of where the name originally came from | do we have any indication of where the name originally came from | ||
who first came upwith the character? | who first came upwith the character? | ||
== Magazines == | |||
Is it possible that the audiobooks and the magazines aren't actually canon to the series? --[[User:TenCents|TenCents]] 23:31, January 8, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:31, 8 January 2010
merge the articles?
I think that information on Romana II belongs in that article not here. then I thought, maybe want to merge the articles Romana I, Romana II and Romana III into one? --Stardizzy2 19:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think it's important to have the three Romana articles as well as the overarching Romana article. This main Romana article is a good place to have the various odd / contradicting bits of information, with the Romana I, II and III article allowing for more in depth information. But the Romana article probably could do with a bit of a thin down / merger of info into the other three. --Tangerineduel 12:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Romana
do we have any indication of where the name originally came from who first came upwith the character?
Magazines
Is it possible that the audiobooks and the magazines aren't actually canon to the series? --TenCents 23:31, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
