Talk:Romana: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(→‎Magazines: new section)
Line 11: Line 11:


== Magazines ==
== Magazines ==
 
{{Talk Page}}
Is it possible that the audiobooks and the magazines aren't actually canon to the series? --[[User:TenCents|TenCents]] 23:31, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
Is it possible that the audiobooks and the magazines aren't actually canon to the series? --[[User:TenCents|TenCents]] 23:31, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:34, 9 January 2010

merge the articles?

I think that information on Romana II belongs in that article not here. then I thought, maybe want to merge the articles Romana I, Romana II and Romana III into one? --Stardizzy2 19:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

I think it's important to have the three Romana articles as well as the overarching Romana article. This main Romana article is a good place to have the various odd / contradicting bits of information, with the Romana I, II and III article allowing for more in depth information. But the Romana article probably could do with a bit of a thin down / merger of info into the other three. --Tangerineduel 12:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Romana

do we have any indication of where the name originally came from who first came upwith the character?

Magazines

Keep calm and stay focused.

Please abide by our discussion policy and be nice to other editors in this discussion. Remember: this talk page is only for discussing the editing of the attached article. Take speculation to The Howling, our general discussion forum. Messages not having to do with the improvement of the article may be deleted.

Is it possible that the audiobooks and the magazines aren't actually canon to the series? --TenCents 23:31, January 8, 2010 (UTC)