Template talk:Companions of the Ninth Doctor: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
: I can agree that Adam Mitchell and Lynda Moss should be single-adventure (Lynda's companion status is similar to [[Jenny (The Doctor's Daughter)|Jenny]]'s). And Mickey should be either narratively ambiguous or single-adventure due to his role as part of the TARDIS team in ''Boom Town'' (despite not actually taking a trip in the TARDIS). [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 02:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:21, 21 February 2021
See also
Since alot of Companion templates include a "See also" section now, which seems to include some people who may or may not fit under a looser definition of Companion, I was wondering if one should be included here. Mainly to add the character of Lynda Moss, who has been added and removed in the past as a "disputed companion" (understandably).--75.49.216.182 07:58, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
Rosie Taylor
Could the one-off companion Rosie Taylor be added? <TheChampionOfTime ☎ 02:46, January 2, 2016 (UTC)>
Mickey Smith
I wonder if Mickey should be included under "single adventure" or "narratively ambiguous" given the fact he joins the Doctor, Rose and Jack for the events of Boom Town. 23skidoo ☎ 06:04, February 25, 2017 (UTC)
Proposed update
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- I can agree that Adam Mitchell and Lynda Moss should be single-adventure (Lynda's companion status is similar to Jenny's). And Mickey should be either narratively ambiguous or single-adventure due to his role as part of the TARDIS team in Boom Town (despite not actually taking a trip in the TARDIS). RadMatter ☎ 02:21, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
