Talk:Walter the Worm (novel): Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
No edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 38: Line 38:
:: Also, you ''cannot'' say that we shouldn't count Vienna as a precedent because we are waiting for the discussion to be reopened as you are bound to current policy.  [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
:: Also, you ''cannot'' say that we shouldn't count Vienna as a precedent because we are waiting for the discussion to be reopened as you are bound to current policy.  [[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] [[User talk:RadMatter|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 12:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)


::: ...I do not ever recall a specific inclusion debate for ''[[Hell's Belles]]'' @[[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] - only the inclusion debate for the series as a whole, which, IIRC, was botched up as nobody had actually ''read'' the damn novels, a common trend with Magrs' Works That Are Not Covered By This Wiki (cough''[[Baker's End (audio series)|Baker's End]]''cough). And as for Early Bird... you're still assuming that [[Roger Hargreaves]] believes that the ''[[Dr. Men (series)|Dr. Men]]'' are a mere crossover. What evidence do you have to support your claims? Until you can actually provide something tangible, let's treat this series with the benefit of the doubt. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>'''Epsilon'''</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
::: ...I do not ever recall a specific inclusion debate for ''[[Hell's Belles]]'' @[[User:RadMatter|RadMatter]] - only the inclusion debate for the series as a whole, which, IIRC, was botched up as nobody had actually ''read'' the damn novels, a common trend with Magrs' Works That Are Not Covered By This Wiki (cough''[[Baker's End (audio series)|Baker's End]]''cough). And as for Early Bird... you're still assuming that [[Roger Hargreaves]] believes that the ''[[Dr. Men (series)|Dr. Men]]'' are a mere crossover, and that ''Dr. Men'' isn't a part of the world of ''Mr. Men'', or vice versa. What evidence do you have to support your claims? Until you can actually provide something tangible, let's treat this series with the benefit of the doubt. <div style="background-color:#0E234E; border: solid 0.5px gold; display: inline; white-space: nowrap;">[[doctorwho:user:Epsilon the Eternal|<span style="background:#0E234E; color:white"><code>'''Epsilon'''</code></span>]][[doctorwho:user talk:Epsilon the Eternal|📯]] [[doctorwho:special:Contributions/Epsilon the Eternal|📂]]</div> 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:44, 26 May 2021

Validity

The character, Early Bird, first appears in Dr. First. To my knowledge, this was his first appearance in any Mr Men universe story. Toy Story Fan 09:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Ooh, this is possibly an extremely interesting find! How knowledgeable are you when it comes to Mr. Men? The type of role the Early Bird gets in Dr. First means it could have feasibly appeared in any of the existing Mr. Men universe stories. It might be quite difficult to verify Dr. First as the first appearance given the amount of online information on the subject (just look at the Mr. Men Wiki's page on Doctor Who!). Borisashton 10:57, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Dear god that page is just so... laughable. 11:02, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
I have access to every Little Miss book and a decent number of Mr Men books. I will check through what I can access when I have the time to and relay the information back here. Bongo50 (aka Bongolium500) 07:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Regardless if the character appeared first in the DWU crossover I personally do not think that this page should exist. The character of the Early Bird was clearly intended to be a Mr. Men character rather than a DWU character. RadMatter 09:27, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

The page should exist, however, even if that were the case. A story which exploits a license to a character who debuted in a DWU story, but fails Rule 4, should be covered as {{invalid}}.
However, that is, anyway, not really a distinction the Wiki recognises. We view the Dr. Men book as taking place in the DWU straight-on, not as a case of two universes interacting; therefore by definition any character who is introduced as existing in the universe of those books is an N-Space character, even if in marketing terms they're not advertised as a Doctor Who character. Scrooge MacDuck 10:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
That is simply incorrect.
It is the same reason why Vienna and The Confessions of Dorian Gray only have overview pages rather than individual story pages like this because, despite making their first appearance in a DWU story, they were never intended to be part of the DWU permanently (Vienna pending discussion). RadMatter 10:35, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
That is where you are wrong, as both series have been described in some capacity as being not set in the DWU. (Though Vienna is oh-so-tenuously been stated to be set outside of the DWU, of course.)
However, with Mr Men, there has been no such statement 10:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
There doesn't have to be a statement. The Mr Men books are their own series with no connection to the DWU outside of these crossover stories. Scrooge said that because the Early Bird made their first appearance in a DWU story that we now have to cover every story that they appear in because they are a DWU character, but as my examples have proven this has never been the case. RadMatter 10:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
No, these statements make or break coverage; if it hadn't been for these quotes, we'd most likely be covering all of Dorian Gray. We cannot just assume something is set outside the DWU - with Mr. Men, the Doctor Who mythos has essentially become one with it, so therefore, if a DWU character appears in Mr. Men books after Dr. Men without a rule four failing statement, these stories deserve coverage. 11:09, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I would like to show my support for the coverage of Mr Men in a valid, or at the very least invalid, capacity. However, this is all dependant on whether Early Bird did actually debue in Dr. First. Therefore, I feel this should be verified first, something I will happily help with when I have more time (likely in about 3-5 days). Bongo50 (aka Bongolium500) 11:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Let me clarify something: The Confession of Dorian Gray is not covered because it's a case of a public-domain character being played by the same actor in a DWU source and another series; it's become clear that it's a different (if similar) take on Dorian Gray. The Confession Dorian is simply not a licensed character who debuted in the DWU.
Vienna is a weird aberration and should not be counted because it's 95% certain we will bring her back into the fold once we have Forums. But even then, she was only excluded because there was an explicit quote which was interpreted as telling us she was not only "not in the conventional DWU", but "not a Doctor Who-related character". We took the interpretation that Vienna had been created as an independent character all along, and had happened to first appear in the Doctor Who story in terms of release order.
Is it possible the Early Bird is in a similar boat to what-we-have-thus-far-thought-was-up-with-Vienna? Maybe. Heck, it's even possible to argue that it's a public domain character too, what with coming from a saying. I'm really not sure Walter the Worm belongs on this Wiki. And we haven't even established for sure that the Mr Men Early Bird debuted in a valid source at all.
But in terms of policy, let me be crystal clear: in the overwhelming majority of cases, if a story uses a character who debuted in a licensed work we cover, then we will have a page about that story. If that story is not meant to be set in the DWU, this will simply make the page {{invalid}}. The vanishingly rare cases where a story exploits a license to a concept that debuted in the DWU, and yet is not covered on this Wiki, are abnormal and idiosyncratic and do not reflect the Wiki's general philosophy in these matters. Interested parties should reread T:VS. Scrooge MacDuck 12:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Just because a character appeared in a DWU story does not mean that every subsequent appearance of that character is worthy of coverage - especially in an established non-DWU series such as the Mr Men books. And regardless, Scrooge you already know that the appearance of a single character has been deemed in the past to be not enough for coverage - for example; Panda's appearance in Hells Bells was ruled as not enough to cover the Brenda and Effie series and we have since had to unearth more links to other DWU licensed concepts and are waiting to reopen the discussion.
Also, you cannot say that we shouldn't count Vienna as a precedent because we are waiting for the discussion to be reopened as you are bound to current policy. RadMatter 12:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
...I do not ever recall a specific inclusion debate for Hell's Belles @RadMatter - only the inclusion debate for the series as a whole, which, IIRC, was botched up as nobody had actually read the damn novels, a common trend with Magrs' Works That Are Not Covered By This Wiki (coughBaker's Endcough). And as for Early Bird... you're still assuming that Roger Hargreaves believes that the Dr. Men are a mere crossover, and that Dr. Men isn't a part of the world of Mr. Men, or vice versa. What evidence do you have to support your claims? Until you can actually provide something tangible, let's treat this series with the benefit of the doubt. 12:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)