Talk:The Cosmology of the Spiral Politic (feature): Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
So I don't want to make an exclusion debate about this just yet - I'd first prefer to see if I'm just out of my mind - but I've been thinking about fleshing out some of the articles for the FP books/stories I've read, and I noticed that this one is listed as a valid source. Which is a bit bizarre to me, because in my mind it doesn't really seem to have a narrative, but instead appears to be a short summary of the cosmology of the DWU. Maybe I'm just insane, but it doesn't seem like this meets rule 1 to me (even if I think the current rule 1 should be changed). [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:21, July 19, 2020 (UTC) | So I don't want to make an exclusion debate about this just yet - I'd first prefer to see if I'm just out of my mind - but I've been thinking about fleshing out some of the articles for the FP books/stories I've read, and I noticed that this one is listed as a valid source. Which is a bit bizarre to me, because in my mind it doesn't really seem to have a narrative, but instead appears to be a short summary of the cosmology of the DWU. Maybe I'm just insane, but it doesn't seem like this meets rule 1 to me (even if I think the current rule 1 should be changed). [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 05:21, July 19, 2020 (UTC) | ||
: And so it has, if perchance you'd care to unstubbify this one of these days… [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | : And so it has, if perchance you'd care to unstubbify this one of these days… [[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 22:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
::Added to [[User:Najawin/Sandbox 2|my list]]. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 22:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:14, 24 February 2023
Validity?
So I don't want to make an exclusion debate about this just yet - I'd first prefer to see if I'm just out of my mind - but I've been thinking about fleshing out some of the articles for the FP books/stories I've read, and I noticed that this one is listed as a valid source. Which is a bit bizarre to me, because in my mind it doesn't really seem to have a narrative, but instead appears to be a short summary of the cosmology of the DWU. Maybe I'm just insane, but it doesn't seem like this meets rule 1 to me (even if I think the current rule 1 should be changed). Najawin ☎ 05:21, July 19, 2020 (UTC)
- And so it has, if perchance you'd care to unstubbify this one of these days… Scrooge MacDuck ⊕ 22:12, 24 February 2023 (UTC)