User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150917235441/@comment-4028641-20151009164214: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
That's the one of the problems with UNBOUND tho -- our policies still don't have anything to do with the 'Whoniverse,' and furthermore it again connects itself with a series based in "alternate continuums." There are many complex ideas and reasons that go into our policies, and I think that we should just go simple: 'INVALID' or 'NOTVALID' are the best choices in my eyes. | That's the one of the problems with UNBOUND tho -- our policies still don't have anything to do with the 'Whoniverse,' and furthermore it again connects itself with a series based in "alternate continuums." There are many complex ideas and reasons that go into our policies, and I think that we should just go simple: 'INVALID' or 'NOTVALID' are the best choices in my eyes. | ||
Also I should note that this prefix is obviously taken from the series ''Doctor Who Unbound''. I would suggest against naming the prefix after a story or series -- stories in or out of our invalid grouping are constantly fluctuating, and we could see a day that any story we consider invalid suddenly becomes valid on the site. | Also I should note that this prefix is obviously taken from the series ''Doctor Who Unbound''. I would suggest against naming the prefix after a story or series -- stories in or out of our invalid grouping are constantly fluctuating, and we could see a day that any story we consider invalid suddenly becomes valid on the site. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Panopticon/20150917235441-4028641/20151009164214-4028641]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 23:17, 27 April 2023
That's the one of the problems with UNBOUND tho -- our policies still don't have anything to do with the 'Whoniverse,' and furthermore it again connects itself with a series based in "alternate continuums." There are many complex ideas and reasons that go into our policies, and I think that we should just go simple: 'INVALID' or 'NOTVALID' are the best choices in my eyes.
Also I should note that this prefix is obviously taken from the series Doctor Who Unbound. I would suggest against naming the prefix after a story or series -- stories in or out of our invalid grouping are constantly fluctuating, and we could see a day that any story we consider invalid suddenly becomes valid on the site.
