User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-188432-20130310185635: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO | Forum Archive | The Reference Desk
(Bot: Automated import of articles) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{retitle|The Reference Desk/Tribe of Gum}} | |||
Can those of you who get ''Doctor Who Magazine'' before the rest of us please keep a very close eye on ''[[Hunters of the Burning Stone]]''? We need to be ''very'' cautious about declaring the Tribe of Gum to be the "same one from ''An Unearthly Child''" — because the word "Gum" does not appear in either the serial or the novelisation. As far as we know, right now, our article at [[Tribe of Gum]] is actually wrong, and it should not be assumed, on the ''sole'' basis of the picture at right, that this story '''''retroactively''''' gives the name "Tribe of Gum" to the tribe depicted in the serial. | Can those of you who get ''Doctor Who Magazine'' before the rest of us please keep a very close eye on ''[[Hunters of the Burning Stone]]''? We need to be ''very'' cautious about declaring the Tribe of Gum to be the "same one from ''An Unearthly Child''" — because the word "Gum" does not appear in either the serial or the novelisation. As far as we know, right now, our article at [[Tribe of Gum]] is actually wrong, and it should not be assumed, on the ''sole'' basis of the picture at right, that this story '''''retroactively''''' gives the name "Tribe of Gum" to the tribe depicted in the serial. | ||
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude> | <noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Reference Desk/20130310185635-188432]]</noinclude> | ||
Latest revision as of 00:27, 28 April 2023
Can those of you who get Doctor Who Magazine before the rest of us please keep a very close eye on Hunters of the Burning Stone? We need to be very cautious about declaring the Tribe of Gum to be the "same one from An Unearthly Child" — because the word "Gum" does not appear in either the serial or the novelisation. As far as we know, right now, our article at Tribe of Gum is actually wrong, and it should not be assumed, on the sole basis of the picture at right, that this story retroactively gives the name "Tribe of Gum" to the tribe depicted in the serial.
