User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-26947371-20150905201747: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
(Bot: Automated import of articles)
 
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-26947371-20150905201747'''
{{retitle|The Reference Desk/Numbering Doctors}}
When editing articles such as Time of the Doctor, or the Eleventh Doctor, shouldn't it be ok to actually say the's the twelfth incarnation but the eleventh to use Doctor? {{retitle|///Numbering Doctors}}
When editing articles such as Time of the Doctor, or the Eleventh Doctor, shouldn't it be ok to actually say the's the twelfth incarnation but the eleventh to use Doctor?  
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:SOTO archive posts|The Reference Desk/20150905201747-26947371]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 April 2023

When editing articles such as Time of the Doctor, or the Eleventh Doctor, shouldn't it be ok to actually say the's the twelfth incarnation but the eleventh to use Doctor?