Forum:Idea: Ongoing validity debate template: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
mNo edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
Line 7: Line 7:
I suppose so? {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
I suppose so? {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


I'd love this - potentially we could still use the current template images, but just change the text and the link to go to the relevent thread (or talk page). Or we could create a new template image called "validity under discussion" or smth. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
:I'd love this - potentially we could still use the current template images, but just change the text and the link to go to the relevent thread (or talk page). Or we could create a new template image called "validity under discussion" or smth. [[User:Cousin Ettolrhc|Cousin Ettolrahc]] [[User talk:Cousin Ettolrhc|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 
::Viable, sure? I don't see the necessity. I think the number of users who care about our byzantine validity policies and don't also pay attention to our forums is a rather small set. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:40, 12 August 2023

IndexThe Old Workshops → Idea: Ongoing validity debate template
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.


Introduction[[edit source]]

Would a template that marks a story as currently being at the centre of a validity debate being viable? WaltK 20:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Discussion[[edit source]]

I suppose so?

20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

I'd love this - potentially we could still use the current template images, but just change the text and the link to go to the relevent thread (or talk page). Or we could create a new template image called "validity under discussion" or smth. Cousin Ettolrahc 21:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Viable, sure? I don't see the necessity. I think the number of users who care about our byzantine validity policies and don't also pay attention to our forums is a rather small set. Najawin 21:40, 12 August 2023 (UTC)