Talk:F*cker: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page, [[F*ck]] , and [[F*ck buddy]] were renamed to have asterisks instead of u s when we were at f*ndom to comply with their terms of service. Now that we are independent we are free to title these pages using the uncensored titles. {{unsigned|Neverlast999}} | This page, [[F*ck]] , and [[F*ck buddy]] were renamed to have asterisks instead of u s when we were at f*ndom to comply with their terms of service. Now that we are independent we are free to title these pages using the uncensored titles. {{unsigned|Neverlast999}} | ||
: Not as such; we have a hosting agreement of our own, and although we can have it, we're supposed to ''tag'' NSFW content. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | : Not as such; we have a hosting agreement of our own, and although we can have it, we're supposed to ''tag'' NSFW content. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|Scrooge MacDuck]] [[User talk:Scrooge MacDuck|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 17:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:: Waitaminute… is it still okay to have word appear in images? [[Panda in Rwanda (illustration)|A recent illustration]] depicts the word uncensored. ''Twice''. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | :: Waitaminute… is it still okay to have the word appear in images? [[Panda in Rwanda (illustration)|A recent illustration]] depicts the word uncensored. ''Twice''. [[User:WaltK|WaltK]] [[User talk:WaltK|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 18:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:24, 14 November 2024
Proposed rename?
This page, F*ck , and F*ck buddy were renamed to have asterisks instead of u s when we were at f*ndom to comply with their terms of service. Now that we are independent we are free to title these pages using the uncensored titles. – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Neverlast999 (talk • contribs) .
- Not as such; we have a hosting agreement of our own, and although we can have it, we're supposed to tag NSFW content. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 17:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Waitaminute… is it still okay to have the word appear in images? A recent illustration depicts the word uncensored. Twice. WaltK ☎ 18:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)