Howling:River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!!: Difference between revisions

Howling:River Song is a....... MAJOR SPOLIERS!!! (view source)

Revision as of 07:48, 16 July 2010

No change in size , 16 July 2010

no edit summary

Anonymous user

203.168.176.42

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 ::How did you know there were even a 'good man' then, Bishop and River could have lied? How did you know the Doctor is the Doctor; he is certainly most untrustworthy, he could be some chav boy on the street that stole the TARDIS and modified his biology using a chameleon arch...I think there is a difference between random guessing and speculative...Is Rory still alive a really strong support to make it speculative?
 ::: I believe there is a 'best man' because Father Octavian said so and had no apparent motive to lie and River confirmed it. While the Doctor may not be the most trustworthy person he is more so than River. And again, I don't think Rory is the 'best man,' I just thought the reasoning for his exclusion was silly. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 06:17, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
-::: Well, Father Octavian didn't trust the Doctor neither, so saying that onscreen characters like River deliberately faking a reaction would suggest selectively trusting what the characters say with no reason.  Moreover, how many times have River lied and how many times have the Doctor been shown to lie?  River just didn't tell the Doctor everything, it's horrible to assume that every natural thing River does or say is a lie.--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
+::: Well, Father Octavian didn't trust the Doctor neither, so saying that onscreen characters like River deliberately faking a reaction would suggest selectively trusting what the characters say with no reason.  Moreover, how many times have River lied and how many times have the Doctor been shown to lie?  River just didn't tell the Doctor everything, it's horrible to assume that every natural thing River does or say is a lie.--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 ::Writers don't write in reactions to mislead...actors act 'actions' they don't act reactions...writing in fake reactions would be extremely bad writing...
 :::Re: Reactions, not what you mean there. I simply meant River lies, so using what she says or does as definitive proof is foolhardy. One minute she implies the Doctor didn't teach her how to fly the TARDIS, the next minute she says he did. She won't answer direct questions and tries to keep secrets from the Doctor. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 06:17, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
-:::No one knows anything about who taught River fly the TARDIS yet, and as you said, she implied the Doctor didn't teach her...It is you who assumed that the Doctor didn't teach her...she didn't say it explicitly, so you consider that lying?  There are countless reasons to account for what she said, Eleventh could have taught some of it or maybe it's the 12th/13th...it's just stupid to say that you assume she meant something when she just wasn't being clear and then you hold her responsible for lying.  Not answering direct questions and trying to keep secrets has no relation to how she naturally reacts when she sees Auton Rory...We already know that she did this to avoid interferring with the Doctor's future timeline.  If she knew she killed future Rory, do you seriously think it makes sense that she would pretend to shoot at a past Rory and put up an act when the Universe is collapsing?--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
+:::No one knows anything about who taught River fly the TARDIS yet, and as you said, she implied the Doctor didn't teach her...It is you who assumed that the Doctor didn't teach her...she didn't say it explicitly, so you consider that lying?  There are countless reasons to account for what she said, Eleventh could have taught some of it or maybe it's the 12th/13th...it's just stupid to say that you assume she meant something when she just wasn't being clear and then you hold her responsible for lying.  Not answering direct questions and trying to keep secrets has no relation to how she naturally reacts when she sees Auton Rory...We already know that she did this to avoid interferring with the Doctor's future timeline.  If she knew she killed future Rory, do you seriously think it makes sense that she would pretend to shoot at a past Rory and put up an act when the Universe is collapsing?--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 ::When you are being chased by a Dalek and the world is ending in 20 mins, I don't think anyone would be very good at making up lies about the first thing you see...
 :::Well, she found time to make a joke about the fez in the same scenario. And she make a joke about the handcuffs a minute before she died. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 06:17, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
-:::The handcuff is related to her death only and has nothing to do with the end of the world, and handcuffs have special sentimental values between the Doctor and her.  It makes perfect sense to bring it up when she's dying.  The fez was a shock to her when he saved her from the TARDIS, and it shows that she's reacting and not acting and also it means even less time for her to put up an act about Rory.--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
+:::The handcuff is related to her death only and has nothing to do with the end of the world, and handcuffs have special sentimental values between the Doctor and her.  It makes perfect sense to bring it up when she's dying.  The fez was a shock to her when he saved her from the TARDIS, and it shows that she's reacting and not acting and also it means even less time for her to put up an act about Rory.--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 ::I haven't seen anyone saying that the murdering of the 'good man' didn't cause any catastrophic event...I know nothing about the murder yet...I would be glad if you could point me to the source....
 :::Wat? So you want proof that of an event no one said happened??? [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]]
-:::Exactly, no one have mentioned anything about the event yet; how do you know that no catastrophic event will happen?  You just keep on assuming things that're completely unsubstantiated...--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
+:::Exactly, no one have mentioned anything about the event yet; how do you know that no catastrophic event will happen?  You just keep on assuming things that're completely unsubstantiated...--[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 ::I might have missed it, but I actually can't even remember if the Doctor knew that River Song killed the Dalek...the world is ending and the Doctor is about to sacrifice himself, it didn't sound like exactly the best time to share every single detail of you killing a random Dalek[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 06:22, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 :::The Doctor didn't react then, he didn't react later. It's obvious to me she didn't tell him because I think he wouldn't have been so cordial with her if he knew what she did. I believe that scene was meant to give us a one-up on the Doctor. We are aware of River's vicious side while the Doctor is probably not aware. [[User:Vegnas|Vegnas]] 06:17, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
-:::Do you really think it would make sense if River Song stopped the dying Doctor from flying the Pandorica to the TARDIS a minute before the end of the world just to tell him in detail that she killed a Dalek and how the Dalek asked for mercy?  We've only seen River meeting the Doctor briefly in another scene after that and it was hardly the right time to bring up the topic of a murder...how awkward it would be to run around in someone's wedding to tell people that you murdered a Dalek when you're only staying for a minute.  River only had one brief chance to talk to the Doctor, don't you find it odd to bring back the topic of killing a villain, despite that the problem's already solved, instead of bidding farewell...Moreover, to say that the Doctor is completely ignorant of River's personality is just stupid...She carries around a GUN...she wasn't really the pacificist in the Library neither.  The Doctor even knows that she murdered someone...maybe the Doctor doesn't know how far she'll go, but he definitely knows that River is not a Martha Jones --[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
+:::Do you really think it would make sense if River Song stopped the dying Doctor from flying the Pandorica to the TARDIS a minute before the end of the world just to tell him in detail that she killed a Dalek and how the Dalek asked for mercy?  We've only seen River meeting the Doctor briefly in another scene after that and it was hardly the right time to bring up the topic of a murder...how awkward it would be to run around in someone's wedding to tell people that you murdered a Dalek when you're only staying for a minute.  River only had one brief chance to talk to the Doctor, don't you find it odd to bring back the topic of killing a villain, despite that the problem's already solved, instead of bidding farewell...Moreover, to say that the Doctor is completely ignorant of River's personality is just stupid...She carries around a GUN...she wasn't really the pacificist in the Library neither.  The Doctor even knows that she murdered someone...maybe the Doctor doesn't know how far she'll go, but he definitely knows that River is not a Martha Jones --[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 07:48, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
 :Let's hope Moffat don't make this into a running joke and kills Rory whenever there seems to be too little going on...[[Special:Contributions/203.168.176.42|203.168.176.42]] 05:05, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
 :How about she could be another Time Lord and she is the person who kills the 12th Doctor to leads to the 13 Doctor (Matt Smith is the 11th doctor but only the 10th regenieration)