Forum:Is material on the Advent Calender canonical: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::The [[WC]] prefix would do us, wouldn't it? Or if not, maybe we should replace it with one that would comfortably cover all web-offered content.--[[User:Richard Jones|Richard Jones]] 19:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | ::The [[WC]] prefix would do us, wouldn't it? Or if not, maybe we should replace it with one that would comfortably cover all web-offered content.--[[User:Richard Jones|Richard Jones]] 19:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::I dunno, webcast would just seem to apply to the internet animations (though we may get those later in the month). -<[[User:Azes13|Azes13]] 19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)>- | |||
Revision as of 19:22, 2 December 2007
Index → Panopticon → Is material on the Advent Calender canonical
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Well, I was browsing the internet lately (as I am wont to do) when I discovered the Advent Calender, specifically the short story The Frozen. So, I have two questions about this.
- Do we consider this canon? Or at least canon enough to be brought up?
- If we do consider it canon, what would be the abbreviation be? Do we have anything for general short-stories? Would it need a new abbreviation, like AC or something?
Personally, I would go with yes for the first one, but I have no idea for the second. I want to see if anyone else has any ideas for this. -<Azes13 19:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)>-
- The WC prefix would do us, wouldn't it? Or if not, maybe we should replace it with one that would comfortably cover all web-offered content.--Richard Jones 19:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- I dunno, webcast would just seem to apply to the internet animations (though we may get those later in the month). -<Azes13 19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)>-
