Forum:UNIT aren't really companions: Difference between revisions

Forum:UNIT aren't really companions (edit)

549 bytes added , 28 August 2011

no edit summary

Anonymous user

Revision as of 03:49, 27 August 2011 (edit) Icecreamdif (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:08, 28 August 2011 (edit) (undo) 173.228.85.35 (talk) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 66:		Line 66:

	Sorry, I haven't read the novels. I thought he was saying that Yates was a Fourth Doctor companion in the novels.[[User:Icecreamdif\|Icecreamdif]] 03:49, August 27, 2011 (UTC)		Sorry, I haven't read the novels. I thought he was saying that Yates was a Fourth Doctor companion in the novels.[[User:Icecreamdif\|Icecreamdif]] 03:49, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

			:He was saying that Yates was a 4th Doctor companion because of the AudioGO audios, not the novels. But in the very next sentence, he says that this doesn't mean he was a 3rd Doctor companion, which he answers in the next sentence by throwing in the novels. How you got from that to he was a 3rd Doctor companion because he was a 4th Doctor companion, I have no idea, since it's pretty much the exact opposite of what he said, in very clear and simple sentences. --[[Special:Contributions/173.228.85.35\|173.228.85.35]] 03:08, August 28, 2011 (UTC)