Forum:UNIT aren't really companions: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 68: Line 68:


:He was saying that Yates was a 4th Doctor companion because of the AudioGO audios, not the novels. But in the very next sentence, he says that this doesn't mean he was a 3rd Doctor companion, which he answers in the next sentence by throwing in the novels. How you got from that to he was a 3rd Doctor companion because he was a 4th Doctor companion, I have no idea, since it's pretty much the exact opposite of what he said, in very clear and simple sentences. --[[Special:Contributions/173.228.85.35|173.228.85.35]] 03:08, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
:He was saying that Yates was a 4th Doctor companion because of the AudioGO audios, not the novels. But in the very next sentence, he says that this doesn't mean he was a 3rd Doctor companion, which he answers in the next sentence by throwing in the novels. How you got from that to he was a 3rd Doctor companion because he was a 4th Doctor companion, I have no idea, since it's pretty much the exact opposite of what he said, in very clear and simple sentences. --[[Special:Contributions/173.228.85.35|173.228.85.35]] 03:08, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
Yeah, I reread it and I get the point now. I only follow the tv shows, so all the rest sort of blends together for me. Upon rereading, I realize that he was a fourth doctor companion in a different spinoff story from when he was a third doctor companion.[[User:Icecreamdif|Icecreamdif]] 22:13, August 29, 2011 (UTC)
1,805

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.