Talk:Teselecta: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Teselecta also displayed regeneration process. That could be noted somewhere. | Teselecta also displayed regeneration process. That could be noted somewhere. | ||
*It wasn't regenerating though, it was mimicking what a regeneration looked like (possibly why he had them stay so far away). '''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 19:34, October 2, 2011 (UTC) | *It wasn't regenerating though, it was mimicking what a regeneration looked like (possibly why he had them stay so far away). '''<font color=#609000>d</font> [[User:Witoki|<font color=#609000>●</font>]][[User_talk:Witoki|<font color=#FF6090>●</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Witoki|<font color=#6090FF>●</font>]]''' 19:34, October 2, 2011 (UTC) | ||
NO! It's still mispelt. It's Te''ss''electa; you're missing an "s". | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 6 February 2012
Spelling
However more sense "Tesselecta" makes, the correct spelling is with one s, according to the official site. The page name needs to be changed, as does the spelling on other pages, such as on Tessalecta Antibodies. D0ct0r11 •
- That's pretty strange, as it would be easy to see how it would be comparable to a tesseract in certain ways. But, the website takes precedence I suppose. d ●●● 19:00, August 28, 2011 (UTC)
Teselecta also displayed regeneration process. That could be noted somewhere.
- It wasn't regenerating though, it was mimicking what a regeneration looked like (possibly why he had them stay so far away). d ●●● 19:34, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
NO! It's still mispelt. It's Tesselecta; you're missing an "s".
