Talk:The Doctor's ninth incarnation

Alternative events?

this is a alternative version of the doctor why we not put it into alternate version catagory in the book davies said paralel events– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doctor other (talk • contribs) 14:30, 30 April 2020.

This has kinda been discussed to death at this point, but the quote about "parallel events" has to be balanced with "all stories are true, all Doctors exist" in the same source, and either way is part of a real-world-focused text which is not in itself a valid source. (Authorial intent as given out-of-universe was used to consign The Infinity Doctors and Doctor Who Unbound to parallel universe status, but always at the conclusion of lengthy special-case forum threads.)

Besides, "parallel events" can mean a lot of things, up to and including these events just unfolding in different places at the same time — "in parallel" — as The Day of the Doctor. The Time War is a weird place. It's perfectly conceivable that several pressings-of-the-Moment would happen alongside each other at its height before collapsing back into a single timeline after Gallifrey disappears, or something along those lines.

As for being an "alternative version", so long as he's not treated by a valid narrative as alternative, we on this Wiki don't make statements about which version of events is 'truer'. An oddity like Doctor Who and the Time War is no less valid than the TV series, and no valid Ninth Doctor is superior to another. --Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 12:41, April 30, 2020 (UTC)

Alternate versions of the Doctor is for individuals who are explicitly stated to be incarnations of the Doctor from alternate timelines, parallel universes, or aborted timelines.

alternate universe like death somebody saw hitler put a statue to a desk and then that person goes back in time take it smashed time line changed paralel universe like that a person make choice traffic light about stop is red or purple he make is it red but paralel earth separetedby the main he make it purple yeah i think this story like that this should be put in alternate versions .– The preceding unsigned comment was added by Doctor other (talk • contribs) .

Category:Typography and punctuation: If people can't understand what you've posted, they certainly can't answer your questions or act on what you suggested. Shambala108 ☎ 22:24, June 14, 2020 (UTC)

Potential merge?

As this is quite clearly meant to be Eccleston, shouldn’t this page be merged with the main Ninth Doctor page, for clarity’s sake? Liria10 ☎ 22:26, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Mmmh… I would be more hesitant if RTD had made the comment about Grant and Atkinson himself, but given that he simply highlighted it but did not make it himself — and that he certainly had Eccleston in mind when he wrote it in 2013… I think you may have a point. The intro with which the story was released makes it clear that the story was written to lead into Rose, so when it refers to "the Ninth Doctor", that's implicitly Eccleston; the argument can fairly be made that this is equivalent to the cover or back-cover of a print novel specifying "This story features the FIFTH FACE of DR. WHO as played by PETER DAVIDSON", and suchlike.

Besides, even though the idea that Doctor Who and the Time War may instead be the origin story of "another" Ninth Doctor is something that the Wiki should cover in some capacity — but perhaps this separate page isn't the right place to do it. It could be handled quite cleanly in the "Behind the scenes" sections of Ninth Doctor and The Doctor's ninth incarnation. Even if we don't acknowledge the Ninth Doctor in …and the Time War as Eccleston, probably we could make do with simply linking to The Doctor's ninth incarnation, really, rather than using this additional dabbed page which implies that it may be a wholly unique Ninth Doctor.

So I hereby make a preliminary ruling that we will merge this page. What must now be discussed is whether we merge it with Ninth Doctor (acknowledging the authorial intent, hinted at by the mention of "ears" and highlighted by the Introduction, that this is Eccleston), or simply with The Doctor's ninth incarnation. I would favour the former solution, relegating the retrospective "ambiguity" to BTS sections; but given that this page has been separate for quite a long time now, I want to let the case for the defence speak before fully going forward. Scrooge MacDuck ☎ 22:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)