The Reference Desk/Dimensions in Time validity (see also; beating a dead horse)

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Reference Desk
Revision as of 00:38, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I’ve more or less accepted by this point that this site is never going to accept Dimensions in Time as a valid source, but whenever I ask about why that is, I’m usually told “look through the debate thread”.

Rather than being directed to that long thread of text walls again...could I just have a simple, bullet-pointed list of the main reasons?

I’m aware of least two of them, both with which I personally disagree (“EastEnders has been established as a fictional work within the DWU” and “the scene in 2013 contradicts EastEnders’ own canon”). What are the other reasons?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Reference_Desk/@comment-43874324-20200828130153&oldid=3534212"