Forum:Serious ....
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
Should an article be made of the character the elth of balhoon if so there is no web picture of the elth so should i just use a pic of the moxx ????
do you think the elth should have his own page ?????Quark16 17:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is a page for the Moxx of Balhoon and for the Gelth please do a search before posting on the forum. (Also your signature should go at the end of your post). --Tangerineduel 17:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- yes, the Elth should have his own page, no you should not use a photo of the Moxx. if you have one, you should use a picture of the Elth from the comic. also, it helps everyone to have a more informative topic header. so, instead of "Serious ...", something like "Should Elth of Balhoon have his own entry?"
know i mean the moxx of balhoons brother the ELTH OF BALOON . you must think im so stupid ofcourse if looked at the
- Can you cite a source for that? --Tangerineduel 18:05, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- whoah, enough with the defensiveness.
ill try to find it . it was in the battles in time comic strip in which the elth kidnapped all the platform one people for revenge of letting the moxx die . its referenced of the moxx of balhoon page . is the battles in time comic strips canon ??? Even if there not the elth of balhonn should have his own page . with you permission may i take up the article ???????Quark16 18:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- this Wiki considers all media canon, so, yeah, that would make this story canon.
- Actually that's not totally true; Category:Non-canonical stories. The comic strip should/is probably canon, though whatever information the cards impart is not (this stems from the roleplaying games back in the day and their tendency to contradict various stories) See also Tardis:Canon policy.
Sorry i should of made myself mor clear . Thanks for your informstion without you id be a little bi clueless about this place. Ive made the page . cant find a pic . no pic then ?????
