Inclusion debates/Are Titan Back-up and WeLoveTITANS comics Valid? [renamed]

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates
Revision as of 15:25, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello, everybody, I am starting to doubt that the backup comic stories in the Titan series Doctor Who: The Eleventh Doctor are an in-universe valid source for us; according to our guidelines, they should be treated like a parody.

In the We love Titans, the characters are portrayed by real world deformed action figures, moreover photographed; for example, in Service with a Shhhh, the Doctor speaks to the readers about the (funny) Bank of Silence.

In the other series written and drawn by Marc Ellerby, his drawings are't realistic, and general tones are not serious. In Pond Life, it is depicted River Song living with her parents; Amy and Rory don't ant her to date the Doctor (even referred as "Who"), in "that death machine of his". In Timeliney Wimey, the Doctor connects to his profile on "Bookface" through his screwdriver; Strax, Leela and Polly Wright are among his contacts and comment on their posts, River Song tags pictures of them... even Judoons (one of them named Steve) follow their profiles on this social network.

I could quote other examples, but mere reading should suggest they are not intended to be take them seriously as we are doing. Any opinions?

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-5545417-20150725190725&oldid=3507682"