More actions
Time Lords a race?
Are the Time Lords a race, cause some sources e.g. REF: Doctor Who: The Encyclopedia says that they are but various sources mentioning before the Time War e.g. DW: The Invasion of Time seem to suggest that they are more of a society? Which of it is it to be? Or is it not certain?
Also is under the Infobox Race category is a Female Time Lord called a Time Lady because humans are sometimes called Man and a male human is also called a man but women is not a species name so is Time Lady?--Skittles the hog 19:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Alternate Doctors
Im not sure enough to change the article but does anyone remember something in Timewrym Revelation suggesting that the alternate Doctor in Inferno and Face of the Enemy was one of the versions shown to the Doctor in the War Games. Im not sure though bc it has been ages since i read revelation --Amxitsa 21:07, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Individual Doctor articles
Is there any plan already laid out somewhere for how to approach articles for the individual Doctors? Or is this being left up for an enterprising soul to tackle at will?
Either way, I may have some time to contribute to such things... UncleMikey 23:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Individual articles on each incarnation of the Doctor are certainly intended to be a part of the project, and the tasks are pretty much up for grabs. The only set requirement is that, as with all articles on characters, planets, alien species, and so forth, the articles be written from a "Whoniverse" point-of-view, that is, written as they would appear to a person living in the Doctor Who universe who would accessing the articles from say, the TARDIS Index File, the Matrix, or some tome in the Library of St. John the Beheaded.
--Freethinker1of1 18:27, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Fifth Doctor (also Known as the First Doctor)
Can someone explain this comment please - it says "see below" but I can't see anything below that explains why the Fifth Doctor is the First Doctor?
- Good question, short of anyone being able to provide a logical explanation of what this means then i suggest we just delete the numbers in brackets --Amxitsa 10:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've removed the items in question. They looked to be the usual sort of smart-alecky edits and vandalism made by people who have nothing else to do with their time. --Freethinker1of1 16:30, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Italics
Why are some of these lines and paragraphs itaicised?
- It might imply that it's from a spin-off, but I'm not entirely sure. I say we should just turn it to regular text. Azes13 23:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, an early idea in this Wiki that any references that were not directly from the TV series (eg books, audios, comic-strips etc) would be written in italics. However, (as demonstrated here) it was felt that this distinction would not be obvious and so was abandoned. --Mantrid 06:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Change main pic?
instead of main picture, perhaps:
- one of the First Doctor, one of the Tenth Doctor, side by side
- just one of the Tenth Doctor
- no main photo and simply photos to the left of all the Doctors, including the minor Doctors, but smaller than the pictures in the main entries for any given Doctor. --***Stardizzy*** 20:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
pictures of the Doctors
update: I plan on uploading small portraits of each Doctor side-by-side with their mini-profile as with Pertwee. I have had some trouble re-sizing the portraits. --***Stardizzy*** 20:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
I think tht the current image should be replaced by a similar one but without the 'Doctor Who' Logo. Taccer 07 00:20, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
side articles to this one (aside from individual Doctor articles for the Big Ten)
- the Doctor's aliases
- the Doctor's name
- information about the Doctor's early life (unless we add this to the First Doctor article)
- the Doctor's age (with a table giving all the ages he has given for himself according to story)
- all the untold adventures that happened in various incarnations (with exception of those we know happened in a given regeneration, even if we didn't see them)
- all the figures (most of them from real Earth history) he has mentioned having met
- the Doctor's skills, talents, abilites
- I like all of these - should they be included in this article (some of them would be quite short), or separate articles? --Sofaman 04:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Aliases of the Doctor currently exists, I'm pretty sure there's a list (though I can't find it) of Earth historical figures who've met / been mentioned by the Doctor.
- Everything else could be combined into a 'Further Information on the Doctor' article. Some of the information wouldn't stretch to a full article, some would probably have a home in Inconsistencies and Retcons (the Doctor's age for instance which when mentioned in Time and the Rani is 953, in Vampire Science it's something like 1,012 then in Aliens of London it's back to 900 etc. --Tangerineduel 13:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I've added a paragraph to Aliases of the Doctor, making a note about his unrevealed given name. --Sofaman 10:55, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Question
I was wondering, if the Doctor can only regenerate 12 times, and I think that has been said before, what will happen once there have been 12 Doctors?
- Nobody knows. Maybe the producers will finally kill him off if the show starts to get bad ratings. Maybe thanks to the Last Great Time War the rule will be nullified. We shall just wait and see. (BTW, 12 regenerations = 13 Doctors.) ~ Ghelæ -talk-contribs 17:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Seeings how we are only at the tenth doctor and to my knowladge the 12 regenerations hasn't been mentioned in the new series it is likley that they may ignore it or give the doctor a new set of regenerations some how (Like the master) as i don't think they will want to end a popular show Dark Lord Xander 02:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's been well-discussed that when and if the show survives long enough for it to be an issue, they'll come up with a workaround. It is worth noting that incoming producer Steven Moffat did in fact do a workaround (granted in a joking fashion) in The Curse of Fatal Death where he gave the Doctor a 13th regeneration and turned the Doctor into Joanna Lumley... 23skidoo 01:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Seeings how we are only at the tenth doctor and to my knowladge the 12 regenerations hasn't been mentioned in the new series it is likley that they may ignore it or give the doctor a new set of regenerations some how (Like the master) as i don't think they will want to end a popular show Dark Lord Xander 02:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Names
Someone added the novel or audio-established real names for The Rani, The Master and The Monk -- without providing the sources. I removed them for that reason (so I wouldn't clutter this core article with Fact tags) but also because it was irrelevant to the current discussion (the article is about the Doctor, not them) and, importantly, because while the BBC hasn't made a hard-and-fast rule as to what is canon, nonetheless none of these names have been established on TV and may be contradicted by the TV series in the future and such iffy info shouldn't be in the lead paragraph of this article. 23skidoo 01:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
As long as they are on the Deca page and their individual pages i don't see a problem with removing it Dark Lord Xander 01:15, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- As far as canon goes see Tardis:Canon policy. Though with regards to the article it wasn't really necessary. --Tangerineduel 13:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Agreed Dark Lord Xander 14:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Half-human
The Doctor is half-human on his mother's side. It has been stated in dialogue and has not been explicity retconned. Whether we like it or not, he is half-human. But my edits to the infobox keep getting reverted.--The Traveller 22:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- The Doctor article refers to the Doctor as a whole (or ones that aren't 1 - 10). The Eighth Doctor claims to be half-human, but when you actually research it it becomes quite murky. The half-human bit can be noted on the Eighth Doctor article page but not The Doctor page.
- Doesn't TV series canon override other media?--The Traveller 17:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- No. See also Tardis:Canon policy. --Tangerineduel 17:25, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Out of universe notes
My understanding is it is acceptable to do this so long as the information is separated (in this case by italics). It's vital to have this information in such an important article, especially with regards to things like Lungbarrow. The only alternative is to create a Footnotes section for this. If someone wants to do that, I'm fine for it, but there are plenty of articles with these real-universe notes.23skidoo 23:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- The indented italicised out of universe notes are fine. --Tangerineduel 12:23, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- not to me. --Stardizzy2 17:51, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Summary of my recent edits
- Cut down on some of the blah-de-blah wordiness, especially in regards to the Doctor's connection with Earth.
- Put the Ten Doctors summary first, rather than the more arcane stuff.
- Put Tenth Doctor references in past tense.
- Cleaned up the sections
- Cut and pasted the discussion of the Doctor's name to Aliases of the Doctor (one part) and Behind the Scenes (another part).
- Removed information on the Doctor's childhood (will cut and paste it in later) into First Doctor, where it belongs. --Stardizzy2 18:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Third Doctor's Picture
I dont know what it is doing in the middle of the page, (well, kind of next to the first doctor) Should it be removed or other pictures added? (TARDY the TARDIS 07:18, 10 October 2008 (UTC))
11
"The Eleventh Doctor will appear in the 2008 christmas special called The Next Doctor. He will be played by David Morrisey" Removed. He's playing a character called the Doctor, but absolutely nothing has confirmed this means he's playing the Eleventh Doctor. For all we know he could just think he is the Doctor or something. Add it back when it's confirmed, 'cause it hasn't been yet. --Golden Monkey 21:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Matt Smith
There's a promo pic of the new Doctor...he looks bizarrely pale, which I assume just means it's a bad picture, but shouldn't it be somewhere on here? --Golden Monkey 18:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)