Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.
Revision as of 14:21, 10 October 2011 by Tangerineduel (talk | contribs) (minor clarification, adding "narrative" to Valid sources to emphasise where info is from)
LockedTab.png

The goal of the TARDIS Index File, the Doctor Who Wiki is to be a reliable, concise guide to all readers. Towards this end, it is necessary for us to restrict to some extent the type of information we accept and to restrict what we cover on this wiki.

Types of article

There are three types of articles:

  • Any subject mentioned in or derived from a television story, prose story, comic story, radio or audio drama. This type is further divided into two sub-types:
  • Real World/Out of universe
  • Information on stories set in the Doctor Who Universe.
  • Information on the creators and actors who have taken part in the making of the stories.
  • Related topics.
For additional resources of information for Real World articles see Tardis:Resources.

The policy of the TARDIS Index File with regard to acceptable sources for use in articles is as follows:

Valid sources

In general, every-narrative-thing licenced by the BBC or the original licence holder of a Doctor Who derived character, race or species is considered a valid source.

Secondary sources

See also Tardis:Resources for more resources for writing articles

These sources are valid sources, however should not be the only source for an article.

  • Novelisations of broadcast television stories by Target Books and other publishers may be used, however any information that contradicts that novelisation's TV story's information is to be considered apocryphal and should not be included within the main body of the article. It should instead be included in the 'Behind the scenes' section of said article.

Other universe sources

The following sources are valid but are a deliberate break from Doctor Who Universe canon and therefore should only be used for articles relating to the worlds, individuals and objects etc created in the sources.

What is not considered a valid source, and why?

This section is still in flux, as elements of this policy are under discussion.
  • Material from FASA's The Doctor Who Role Playing Game and other Role Playing games, as these sometimes contain histories and other information which conflicts with the television and prose stories.
Some material from the FASA game was incorporated into Virgin Publishing's Missing and New Adventures series. Such info should be cited to the NAs/MAs in which they appear, rather than the FASA materials.
  • Merchandise - Several items of merchandise are often given names that never appear in dialogue or are never seen on screen and have often been produced for marketing purposes.
  • Fan-made blueprints and specifications
  • Fan fiction of any kind (this includes fanon).
  • Websites, unless information is clearly stated as sourced listed on the Tardis:Resources page.

What is not covered by this wiki

  • Per Forum:BBV and canon policy the following audio and video based series/stories are not considered part of our canon policy and are not covered in single articles on this wiki.
  • Anything based on BBV's Cyberons; Cyberon, Cybergeddon.
  • Anything from The Stranger series (video or audio) which includes; Summoned by Shadows, More Than a Messiah, In Memory Alone, The Terror Game, Breach of the Peace, Eye of the Beholder, The Last Mission, The Eye of the Storm,
  • Anything from The Wanderer series; Cyber-Hunt and Vital Signs
  • Anything from The Time Travellers series; Republica, Island of Lost Souls, Prosperity Island, The Left Hand of Darkness, The Other Side, Guests for the Night, Ghosts, Only Human, Blood Sports, Punchline
  • The Airzone Solution
  • Infidel's Comet
  • The Pattern

Items on which policy is unclear

Invalid articles

If you believe an article contains nothing but information this wiki does not cover, or is sourced solely from non-valid sources, then check out our deletion policy for information regarding what can be nominated for deletion and the process to do so.

If an article has information concerning a canon subject but contains information from a non-valid resource, the issue should be debated on the article's discussion or talk page, and the article should be edited as appropriate.

See also

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.