no edit summary
(Undo revision 1439435 by 108.35.12.252 (talk) Remove edit that overwrote two existing contributions) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 131: | Line 131: | ||
:::Bold Clone: I'd not say I support the "between 8 and 9" theory. What I would say is that that's the period in the Doctor's life that seems the most likely fit. However, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of some way of putting the "Hurt Doctor" into that period '''without''' inserting him between 8 & 9. We know very little about what happened in the Time War. We know it was full of horrors but the main thing we know is that it was a '''Time''' War. That opens so many possibilities for the manipulation of time by both sides that Moffat could use some kind of "timey-wimey" method to take the "Hurt Doctor" out of the linear sequence. I should say, though, that I'm far from sure that's what Moffat '''will''' do &, even if he does do that, I'd not claim to know '''how''' he'll do it. --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.243.203|89.240.243.203]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.243.203#top|talk to me]]</sup> 23:35, May 23, 2013 (UTC) | :::Bold Clone: I'd not say I support the "between 8 and 9" theory. What I would say is that that's the period in the Doctor's life that seems the most likely fit. However, I wouldn't rule out the possibility of some way of putting the "Hurt Doctor" into that period '''without''' inserting him between 8 & 9. We know very little about what happened in the Time War. We know it was full of horrors but the main thing we know is that it was a '''Time''' War. That opens so many possibilities for the manipulation of time by both sides that Moffat could use some kind of "timey-wimey" method to take the "Hurt Doctor" out of the linear sequence. I should say, though, that I'm far from sure that's what Moffat '''will''' do &, even if he does do that, I'd not claim to know '''how''' he'll do it. --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.243.203|89.240.243.203]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.243.203#top|talk to me]]</sup> 23:35, May 23, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::Yeah, me too; Moffet always seems to have an ace up his sleeve. I'm wondering if Hurt might be an alternate Ninth Doctor. He'd still appear in the Doctor's timeline, but yet maintain Eccleston as 9 (and Tennant as 10, and Smith as 11...), and is at least plausible considering that Hurt probably fought in the ''Time'' War. Thoughts? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 23:56, May 23, 2013 (UTC) | ::::Yeah, me too; Moffet always seems to have an ace up his sleeve. I'm wondering if Hurt might be an alternate Ninth Doctor. He'd still appear in the Doctor's timeline, but yet maintain Eccleston as 9 (and Tennant as 10, and Smith as 11...), and is at least plausible considering that Hurt probably fought in the ''Time'' War. Thoughts? --[[User:Bold Clone|<span style="color:darkblue">'''Bold'''</span>]] [[User Talk:Bold Clone|<span style="color:gold">'''Clone'''</span>]] 23:56, May 23, 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::Something of that kind is indeed what I have in mind. Moffat is keen on the tricks that can be played by manipulating time. One example that may (or may not) be relevant is Amy's question in ''[[Good Night (TV story)|Good Night]]'': How can she remember two very different versions of her own life? Another example is Amy's reaction to having killed Kovarian in the collapsing timeline of ''[[The Wedding of River Song (TV story)|The Wedding of River Song]]'': When River tries to dismiss that action because it happened in an aborted timeline, Amy says it still bothers her -- she can remember doing it, so it's still part of her. I wouldn't expect exactly the same thing but some other variation on the theme is a distinct possibility. --[[Special:Contributions/89.240.243.203|89.240.243.203]]<sup>[[User talk:89.240.243.203#top|talk to me]]</sup> 00:40, May 24, 2013 (UTC) | |||