→5.3 Factual correction: new section
(Changing so text isn't entirely a heading. Added alternative heading. Removed obtrusive signature.) Tag: sourceedit |
(→5.3 Factual correction: new section) Tag: sourceedit |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Confession dial query== | ==Confession dial query== | ||
How can you be teleported inside the Confession Dial, how is there a castle in the Confession Dial, and how do we know it was a Confession Dial that he was teleported into? ''Referring to [[Heaven Sent]].''{{unsigned|NoStringsOnJay}} | How can you be teleported inside the Confession Dial, how is there a castle in the Confession Dial, and how do we know it was a Confession Dial that he was teleported into? ''Referring to [[Heaven Sent]].''{{unsigned|NoStringsOnJay}} | ||
== 5.3 Factual correction == | |||
It is stated in the article that a confession dial can be used as in the manner decipted in recent Doctor Who episode, to profuce a confession from a subject by means of exposing them to their deep fears, also stating that the subject will be released upon confessing to the matter about which he is interrogated. | |||
While it ia true that it indeed what weve seen in the episodes, I dont think we can assume that the altered/manipulated confession dial would always operate in the same way- for instance, used to elicit a confession by use of fears. | |||
I think that while we can and should use the instance of the dial being used against the doctor ad an example of a dial doing something different than originally intended, we must not put it in a way that seems as if it is how it always it, because we cannot know that for sure, but rather provide as an example of such use. Thank you | |||