emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041
edits
Forum:Temporary forums/Inclusion debates speedround (view source)
Revision as of 00:02, 16 April 2023
, 16 April 2023→Gameplay-based LEGO Dimensions trailers
Tag: 2017 source edit |
NateBumber (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 864: | Line 864: | ||
:that a major decision was treated as auxiliary to another issue within the large post, leading people to perhaps miss it | :that a major decision was treated as auxiliary to another issue within the large post, leading people to perhaps miss it | ||
This is what I said of this post as well. I've been trying to avoid accusing others of failing to assume good faith and simply pointed out that the prior comment was predicated on assuming I was making an uncharitable reading, but, C'mon. I literally said that I ''didn't'' think that you accused Nate of this, that such a thing would be uncharitable. I apologize if "slip" caused offense, but I'm simply not going to discuss this further. It can't be constructive. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC) | This is what I said of this post as well. I've been trying to avoid accusing others of failing to assume good faith and simply pointed out that the prior comment was predicated on assuming I was making an uncharitable reading, but, C'mon. I literally said that I ''didn't'' think that you accused Nate of this, that such a thing would be uncharitable. I apologize if "slip" caused offense, but I'm simply not going to discuss this further. It can't be constructive. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 21:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC) | ||
::Since LilPotato aptly mentioned the "Assume good faith" rule, let's remember that it swings both ways! Najawin explicitly denied that OS25 accused me of acting maliciously in the subpages thread, but as it happens, that actually ''was'' my initial reading of OS25's reply. I held off from calling foul only because | |||
::#[[T:NPA]] says, "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions when made without involving their personal character"; and | |||
::#while mulling it over, I thought twice and decided to look for an alternative, good-faith interpretation, as the good-faith rule says we should. | |||
::Indeed, I'm glad I took that second step, since I did think of an alternative explanation which, as it happens, did match OS25's actual intention (at least as he explained in his most recent comment above (albeit a new comment which adds more fodder to the fire, so to speak, of my initial reading)). I recommend extending that same grace to Najawin's comment, the real intended meaning of which, as explained above, certainly constitutes good faith and was immediately apparent to me, at least. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC) | |||