Forum:Temporary forums/Inclusion debates speedround: Difference between revisions

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
m
Line 868: Line 868:
::#[[T:NPA]] says, "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions when made without involving their personal character"; and
::#[[T:NPA]] says, "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions when made without involving their personal character"; and
::#while mulling it over, I thought twice and decided to look for an alternative, good-faith interpretation, as the good-faith rule says we should.
::#while mulling it over, I thought twice and decided to look for an alternative, good-faith interpretation, as the good-faith rule says we should.
::Indeed, I'm glad I took that second step, since I did think of an alternative explanation which, as it happens, did match OS25's actual intention (at least as he explained in his most recent comment above (albeit a new comment which adds more fodder to the fire, so to speak, of my initial reading)). I recommend extending that same grace to Najawin's comment, the real intended meaning of which, as explained above, certainly constitutes good faith and was immediately apparent to me, at least. – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
::Indeed, I'm glad I took that second step, since I did think of an alternative explanation which, as it happens, did match OS25's actual intention! I recommend extending that same grace to Najawin's comment, the real intended meaning of which, as explained above, certainly constitutes good faith (and was immediately apparent to me, at least). – [[User:NateBumber|n8]] ([[User talk:NateBumber|☎]]) 00:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
emailconfirmed, Administrators
15,041

edits

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.