Trusted
8,509
edits
→Discussion
No edit summary |
Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | |||