Trusted
49,199
edits
Tag: 2017 source edit |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | That could work. I do think this is the only time an entire series hasn't been covered due to ''apparent'' authorial intent and yet it failed none of [[T:VS]]... {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 07:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | :Well, except for R4. Previous discussion is [[Thread:117545]] at [[User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon I]] and also a deleted thread [[Forum:Inclusion debate:Señor 105]]. Thread is arguably precedent that this thread should be deleted as well - depending on how badly we mess up their SEO. We messed it up so bad in 2012 that Czech purged the thread so they didn't have a random wiki thread above their actual book. [[User:Najawin|Najawin]] [[User talk:Najawin|<span title="Talk to me">☎</span>]] 08:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: I thought they said that it shouldn't be covered on this Wiki? ''That'' is not the same as "it's not set in the DWU"; and even if this is the case, we'd still end up covering it because it's still licensed. {{User:Epsilon the Eternal/signature}} 08:09, 28 June 2023 (UTC) |