Trusted
6,388
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit 2017 source edit |
||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:: Kate is indeed convincing precedent for the prominence interpretation. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 12:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | :: Kate is indeed convincing precedent for the prominence interpretation. --[[User:Scrooge MacDuck|'''Scrooge MacDuck''']] [[User_talk:Scrooge MacDuck|⊕]] 12:38, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
::: The thing with the Kate precedent is that it can be taken either way. It's half "which one is more recognisable to the average individual who visits the website", and "which one has appeared in more stories". Now, I would argue that the answer to the first would by the WBY Newton, as more people would have watched that than the random EU stories which implicit-real world Newton appears in. However, the answer to the latter argument, I would say, is the implicit-real-world-Newton. Also note that the Kate example was in part an extension of the Amy Pond precedent (having Gillan before Blackwood). Hence it's not quite as simple as all that. {{User:Aquanafrahudy/Signature}} 12:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC) |