Forum:Past FA Review

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 06:30, 10 August 2008 by Dark Lord Xander (talk | contribs) (New page: {{Forumheader|Panopticon}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Know that we have a system of nominating FA's i think its ti...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
IndexPanopticon → Past FA Review
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.


Know that we have a system of nominating FA's i think its time we looked at the feature articles which have been nominated previously and either fix them up or remove there feature status.

As it stands the following (IMO) do not deserve to be FA's without a lot of work

while the others would meet the standard to at least be nominated for feature the following

Need to be expanded as there is a lot of information which can be used for the articles that has been left out or not explained in detail which leaves only

which qualify to be feature articles.

I think we need to remove the FA status from all the articles and put them through the nomination presses to ensure that they meat the standard of a feature article.

The four mentioned above should pass through easy enough meaning we have a four month buffer were they can be re used (when they are officially feature articles) before we need to decide on the next feature article.