Talk:Dr. Men

Webcasts

I'm not convinced that we need a page on the "webcast" of the Twelfth Doctor. It's literally just the cover of his book animated in a loop. It's only a couple frames away from not being something that anyone would consider. OS25 (Talk) 17:28, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

I added it because it was on the Facebook page and as you said, it was an animated a little bit. My original intention was to cover it as a marketing campaign, but it can be removed if you want on the reasons you suggested. --Borisashton ☎ 17:35, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

While I imagine it's just the book spinning in a white void, I'm curious about it. Does anyone have a link to it? (also, I personally believe it may be worthy of a page due to being a licensed 3D "animation", but I suppose I'd have to see it to know) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

(actually, is it this one? If so, I definitely think it's worthy of a page) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

(this goes for some other videos as well (also have I just found an official account posting gifs of original content?)) Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 16:32, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Cannon

Should doctor men be considered a valid source? Could it be considered a spoof? EpicMeeper4991 ☎ 18:48, April 2, 2020 (UTC)

these stories seem very much like Alien Babies! which is invalid. DiSoRiEnTeD1 ☎ 16:44, May 29, 2020 (UTC)

As User:CzechOut explained at Thread:215070 this series is perfectly valid by wiki standards. --Borisashton ☎ 16:51, May 29, 2020 (UTC)

Other example of "Dr. Men"

Technically, Doctor Who meets Mr. Men featured an in-universe (although invalid) depiction of the series, although that could probably go to "Dr. Men (Doctor Who meets Mr. Men).

• 

  The "Doctor Who Roger Hargreaves books". (NOTVALID: Doctor Who meets Mr. Men)

Cookieboy 2005 ☎ 13:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)