User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200711195355

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates‎ | @comment-1432718-20200505204802
Revision as of 13:30, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

So Devious is somewhat not analogous, as it was released on something the BBC sold. But even if we ignore that, it's sort of famously not valid?

I think everyone in this thread agrees, except perhaps DiSoRiEnTeD1's "what would really be lost by their removal?" comment - I've been told not to interpret other user's comments, that they should remain on this site. The question here is validity.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200711195355&oldid=3500867"