User:SOTO/Forum Archive/Inclusion debates/@comment-1432718-20200505204802/@comment-45692830-20200711195355
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
So Devious is somewhat not analogous, as it was released on something the BBC sold. But even if we ignore that, it's sort of famously not valid?
I think everyone in this thread agrees, except perhaps DiSoRiEnTeD1's "what would really be lost by their removal?" comment - I've been told not to interpret other user's comments, that they should remain on this site. The question here is validity.
