Inclusion debates/Iris Explains, The School of Doom and more

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | Inclusion debates
Revision as of 15:19, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-(.*?)'''([\s\S]*) ?\{\{retitle\|///(.*?)\}\} +{{retitle|\2/\5}}\n'''User:\1/\2/@comment-\3'''\4, -'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\5\2/\4-\3))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

apologises for the thread opening the can of worms that is the 10,000 Dawns debate, but i think the other part of my debate is still sound enough to continue on a separate discussion.

in my opinion this site should absolutely cover licensed stories, even if they come from unofficial charity anthologies (or something similar). those that come to mind are Lance Parkin's Iris Explains (from 2001's Missing Pieces) and The School of Doom (from 2002's Myth Makers 12), and Kate Orman's The Caterpillar Room (from 2018's A Second Target for Tommy).

Iris Explains features the licensed use of Iris Wildthyme, and this story as well as The School of Doom features licensed use of Miranda Dawkins. The Caterpillar Room is a direct sequel to The Year of Intelligent Tigers written by the same author.

there are probably tons more examples.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/Inclusion_debates/@comment-45314928-20200707131140&oldid=3507339"