User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150217012708/@comment-188432-20150220171843

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-4028641-20150217012708
Revision as of 23:15, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Extrapolation is disallowed in in-universe sections, as are notes from commentaries. As you've put it, you're "reverse engineering", which isn't what we do here. It's interesting speculation, and I think it does have a place in James Stevens#Behind the scenes, but I would be wholly opposed to any of these images being used as the infobox image, or claiming that the extra depicted here was playing James Stevens.

We don't know for certain that this is Stevens, either through a credits list or dialogue in the episode, nor any in-universe portion of WKK.

What you're trying to do here is the equivalent of calling The Woman (The End of Time) "the Doctor's mother", just because that's what Julie Gardner says in the commentary to TEOT.

And that's just not cricket.