User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944/@comment-45314928-20200525201441

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Panopticon/@comment-45314928-20200525010944
Revision as of 23:42, 27 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"we've already had this discussion at a previous thread"

that discussion was seven years ago, it deserves to be discussed again.

the current system is problematic and shouldnt just be ignored. anything is better than what we have at the moment which just seems like a random selection. you cannot make the suggestion that Adelaide Brooke or River Song were any less companions to 10 than say Canton Everett Delaware III was to 11 but they are included in different sections, and id like to know why.