Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-188432-20130310185635/@comment-26975268-20130804114716

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Reference Desk‎ | @comment-188432-20130310185635
Revision as of 00:27, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I'm just salvaging a post by OttselSpy25 that got dumped here:

This is all blatant speculation. It's clearly the tribe from that story, flashback sequences make it clear that the tribe are one in the same and explain how they got there. They are identified as the same people. They have the same names, faces, and memories. All you seem to be leading in you speculation that it secretly isn't them is that the name of the group is off. That is, at most, an irrelevant production error. More likely it's a retcon, as we should treat it.
There's no hidden messages in the comic, if you read it backwards it doesn't read "I am walrus," and the Tribe of Gum were the same tribe was saw in An Unearthly Child. Case closed really.

I'm personally mostly impartial to this one so I won't butt in.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.