Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-188432-20130505035914/@comment-188432-20130508201133

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Reference Desk‎ | @comment-188432-20130505035914
Revision as of 00:28, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Anoted wrote: Czech, is the title not conjecture because because we're not the ones making the conjecture (though the characters are)?

Well, a conjecture is really when you come to a conclusion based upon incomplete information. Red leech poison would at worst be a plain English name based entirely upon the script. It's not conjecture because there's nothing incomplete about it. It is the poison from the red leech, as we're told by Vastra. That she didn't put the words together in that precise order doesn't mean we guessed at a name. It just means that we applied the rules of English grammar to dialogue actually spoken by a character.

This is clearly not in the same league as, say, flying stingrays, which is simply based upon an observation of a creature. No one calls them a stingray. They just look like them. There, we very much are operating out of a lack of complete information, making the title definitionally conjectural. Here, we're using words that are actually in the script.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.