Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Reference Desk/@comment-24894325-20151215214102/@comment-24894325-20151229125420

< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Reference Desk‎ | @comment-24894325-20151215214102
Revision as of 00:31, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Now a question to everyone who reads. To avoid unnecessary renamings, I would prefer to decide on the naming scheme for puppet copies in advance. The way I understand it, there are more or less two suggestions
Puppet <Name> vs. Name (puppet)

For example, for the two pages I've created before I knew there might be a problem the choice is between

The argument for the currently implemented scheme, Puppet <Name> is that it is apparently used in the script (the cast is unhelpful here).

The argument for switching to <Name> (puppet) is that this scheme has been used before for entities that are copies of people, cf. Mickey Smith (Auton), Martha Jones (clone), Martha Jones (robot), Jennifer Lucas (Ganger), etc.

Please voice your opinion. I remain for the current scheme, now based on the scripts.

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.