User:SOTO/Forum Archive/The Time Lord Academy/@comment-188432-20130501210751/@comment-7302713-20130506150231

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
< User:SOTO‎ | Forum Archive‎ | The Time Lord Academy‎ | @comment-188432-20130501210751
Revision as of 00:48, 28 April 2023 by SV7 (talk | contribs) (Bot: Automated text replacement (-'''User:(SOTO/Forum Archive)/(.*?)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)/\@comment-([\d\.]+)-(\d+)'''\n([\s\S]*)\[\[Category:SOTO archive posts\]\] +\7\2/\4-\3/\6-\5))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

No, I'm pulling your leg. I regularly act stupid for shits and giggles. Could you be more insulting?

I understand the intended use of each template, that has been made quite clear. But this post was specifically about the precise ways in which these templates function that make use of TitleSort preferable to NameSort in certain instances. What I don't understand is how NameSort functions in way preferable to TitleSort. I don't what makes using NameSort better.

At the very end, you say: "As the NameSort documentation makes clear, it's a versatile little template which works in almost every case." Except when TitleSort works better. You say that they can't use them interchangeably and that TitleSort is much more limited. What I'm asking is how. What's the technically difference? If NameSort works better the majority of time can you give an example to show me how.

Maybe I'm missing something completely obvious. Maybe I know everything about how they work and am just failing to put 2 and 2 together. But I'd like to know how they work and so I'm asking. And you're insulting me for that.

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=User:SOTO/Forum_Archive/The_Time_Lord_Academy/@comment-188432-20130501210751/@comment-7302713-20130506150231&oldid=3534815"