Forum:Validity: The Airzone Solution

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 05:44, 6 August 2023 by Cgl1999 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Inclusion debates}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> Now that my validity proposal has concluded has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with ''The Airzone Solution'', which I think could have a case for R4bp because the Airzone Corporation is mentioned in Jay Eale...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Index → Inclusion debates → Validity: The Airzone Solution
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Now that my validity proposal has concluded has concluded, I have another BBV Rule 4 by proxy case that I would like to discuss. This one deals with The Airzone Solution, which I think could have a case for R4bp because the Airzone Corporation is mentioned in Jay Eales' subsection of Burning with Optimism's Flames' Contributors section, which is treated as a valid source by this wiki. Now, I'm aware that the original Airzone Solution film isn't covered on this wiki do to having no official connection to the DWU, however, the novelization of it is due to containing officially licensed references to DWU elements. I think it would make sense to validate the novelization of TAZ by R4bp because of this reference. Cgl1999 ☎ 05:44, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://tardis.wiki/w/index.php?title=Forum:Validity:_The_Airzone_Solution&oldid=3577374"