Talk:Green

From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Revision as of 17:54, 9 October 2024 by Najawin (talk | contribs) (→‎The Green Files must be resurrected)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Green Files must be resurrected[[edit source]]

Why try to destroy army green? And why lie about the shades of green? Some are olive. Some are emerald. Some are bottle green. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a00:23c7:ae85:3a01:e182:4c8:41a5:d225 (talk). 05:00, 8 October 2024

See Forum:Colours identification and merge proposal and its resultant policy Tardis:Colour spectrum policy. Cookieboy 2005 06:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
There are many shares of green. To say they're the same shade of green be a lie. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a00:23c7:ae85:3a01:e182:4c8:41a5:d225 (talk). (or whatever IP it is now)
You were more than welcome to participate in the forum thread. T:BOUND applies. Najawin 06:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
But you seem to fail to understand education is necessary to survival. There is more than one shade of green. Accept it. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2a00:23c7:ae85:3a01:e182:4c8:41a5:d225 (talk). (or whatever IP it is now)
Whilst there are different shades of green, many are interpreted at one's own conjecture - your bottle green may be my emerald, and so Tardis:Colour spectrum policy makes it clear that colours should only go on subpages such as Army Green or Bottle green if a source specifically states it to be as such. SID'gingerfool'RAT - 🔎 |📂|📝 15:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I'm from Ancient Greece, and so I think green, purple, and blue, are all the same color. This entire discussion is very confusing to me. Najawin 17:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)