Forum:Intentional addition of blank spaces
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
Index → Panopticon → Intentional addition of blank spaces
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.
I came across a discussion at User talk:Bold Clone#Cold Star and User talk:Skittles the hog#Cold Star which requires wider discussion here. Bold Clone has been intentionally adding blank space to the bottom of articles. When Skittles called him on it, BC replied "Is it against policy?" meaning that we apparently have to formally legislate on matters that have heretofore been simply assumed "the right thing to do".
Fine.
I propose the following be added to the Tardis:Manual of Style:
- Editors shall not intentionally add spaces (that is blank carriage returns), to the end of articles, as it a} visually unbalances that part of the page; b) prevents certain bot processes from consistently finding the bottom of the page; and c) simply isn't the norm on the wiki, thus leading to visual inconsistency across pages.
- Unnecessary carriage returns are disruptive elsewhere in articles, too. Thus, no more than one blank carriage return shall occur between sections and paragraphs. Additionally, there shall be no space between an infobox and the first word of an article's lead, except in those cases where a disambiguation note need intervene.
- Because
infobox|} '''Topic name''' is the <body of lead>
- will have the effect of preventing the lead sentence from vertically aligning with the top of the infobox or any tags on the page
infobox|}'''Topic name''' is <body of lead>
- is the preferred coding without a disambiguation note and
infobox:} :''You may be looking for <another article> '''Topic name''' is the <body of lead>
- is the preferred coding with a disambiguation note.
Please place your opinions on this codification of what has heretofore been accepted as common sense, below. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 16:03, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
Discussion
Pro
- --Skittles the hog--Talk 14:35, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
