Talk:Ian Chesterton/Appearances

What does that mean?

"Comprehensive but not definitive" What is the useful distinction? Boblipton 00:45, August 6, 2011 (UTC)

What indeed. These lists of appearance pages piss me off so I don't spend much time here, precisely for this reason. They should be done automatically, through the use of categories, rather than being a managed list. The message shouldn't appear at all, as nothing on a wiki is ever truly "definitive" anyway. No need for only these appearance lists to bear such a message — especially since, as you rightly point out, there's no useful distinction between comprehensive and definitive. I think the person who wrote that was probably meaning to say, "comprehensive but not complete". But, as I said, no message like this should adorn these appearance list pages.
czechout<staff /> ☎ ✍  <span style="">01:16:23 Sat 06 Aug 2011 

Thanks, Czechout. I'll remove it.Boblipton 01:20, August 6, 2011 (UTC)