Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Forum:References and continuity: what exactly is the difference?

The Cloisters
Revision as of 23:27, 25 October 2011 by CzechBot (talk | contribs) (enforcing T:DOCTORS; 9th Doctor)
IndexPanopticon → References and continuity: what exactly is the difference?
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

Whilst editing Immortal Sins I started having trouble distinguishing between some references and continuity. Now, I can easily understand the basics of each, but there are some which rather overlap.

For example, take Immortal Sins. "Jack mentions the Doctor". This not continuing something, and Jack is referring to the Doctor, so it would be a reference. "Jack wears his classic RAF coat" (although it isn't there) would be continuity because it continues a fact from a previous episode.

However, then you get things such as:

Although these are all technically continuity, they're also references. The first one is the reference to the phrase "run", the second is Jack referring to the Bad Wolf, and the third is referencing the Trickster's Brigade. So even though they're technically continuity, they're also references.

So my question is, how do we draw the line between the two? To me it seems very temporal and depending on the particular user. Could we look at the possibility of, instead of having a section for them individually, have a section for them both? --The Thirteenth Doctor 15:05, August 21, 2011 (UTC)

Isn't the fixed point stuff referred to in Utopia not in The Parting of the Ways?
Which is kinda the point.
References frame stuff within the in-universe structure of the wiki, while Continuity allows us to frame stuff in how it all fits together.
So in the continuity section it'd read:
The Trickster's Brigade is a reference to an in-universe element, but there isn't any need to reference Turn Left, as the Trickster and his brigade is also mentioned in a handful of SJAs, DW and an NA.
The dialogue observation would be in Continuity or maybe in story notes, suggesting RTD as executive producer or maybe Espenson is including similar dialogue into TW as DW to echo the similar scenes. --Tangerineduel / talk 16:37, August 21, 2011 (UTC)
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.