Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Forum:Reference guides and Illustrated guides - merger

The Cloisters
Revision as of 18:42, 27 January 2012 by CzechOut (talk | contribs)
IndexPanopticon → Reference guides and Illustrated guides - merger
Spoilers are strongly policed here.
If this thread's title doesn't specify it's spoilery, don't bring any up.

How do we actually define one from the other?

I was looking to merge the two articles Doctor Who reference books and Doctor Who illustrated guides to make an article with information, rather than just a list/gallery as they exist at the moment.

But looking between them there seems to be some indecision in what makes an "illustrated guide" and what makes a reference book. Is it a simple fact that one has lots of pictures and the other doesn't?

I'd say that's probably the worst way to decide what is and isn't a reference book.

Doctor Who: The Early Years, Doctor Who: The Sixties, Doctor Who: Regeneration, The New Audio Adventures: The Inside Story and Howe's Transcendental Toybox might all have pictures in them but they're all pretty weighty reference books as well.

I propose we merge not just the articles but also the categories, getting rid of Category:Illustrated guides and put it all into Category:Reference books. --Tangerineduel / talk 14:29, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. We should do that. There is no meaningful definition of an "illustrated guide". That's just marketing lingo.
czechout<staff />    <span style="">18:42: Fri 27 Jan 2012 
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.