Bureaucrats, content-moderator, emailconfirmed, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, threadmoderator
85,404
edits
Forum:Doctor Who: Worlds in Time: Difference between revisions
From Tardis Wiki, the free Doctor Who reference
→General approach
OttselSpy25 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
::Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not a role playing game, I'm saying that it doesn't give a lot of freedom to the player, thus making it very easy to write about the game ''without including info that the player chooses, like name and such.'' [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 20:30, March 23, 2012 (UTC) | ::Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying it's not a role playing game, I'm saying that it doesn't give a lot of freedom to the player, thus making it very easy to write about the game ''without including info that the player chooses, like name and such.'' [[User:OttselSpy25|OS25]] ([[User Talk:OttselSpy25|talk to me, baby.]]) 20:30, March 23, 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Do we cover RPGs or not?== | |||
So despite the fact that [[user:OttselSpy25|OttselSpy25]] has just spent a number of posts seeming to argue that ''WIT'' is not an RPG, we seem agreed that ''WIT'' '''is''' an RPG. So, our question becomes much simpler. '''Are RPGs covered by this wiki?''' | |||
I say there's been a ban in place for four years or more, and that this game only confirms the difficulty of considering an RPG as canon. Our lives would simply be easier if we classed RPGs outside our remit entirely, put up an {{tl|nc}} flag on ''WIT'' and work on hammering out a video game policy to better establish what's in, what's out, and why. {{user:CzechOut/Sig}} <span style="{{User:CzechOut/TimeFormat}}">20:53: Fri 23 Mar 2012 </span> | |||
